After deliberate, thoughtful
contemplation, it's appropriate to apportion responsibility for the current, dispiriting state of the Union.
The culprits encompasses a coalition of breadth, yet they have
a shared feature. The most influential of these factions have
operated in the United States before its inception, practicing dishonesty in the pursuit of public adulation, even before the Declaration of Independence. While the most famous
agent died in 1910, these manipulators of public opinion function
today under the benign names of The Late Show, SNL, and The Onion.
These organizations, and many more,
trace a continuous line all the way back to Benjamin Franklin who
said, “a benevolent man should allow a few faults in himself, to
keep his friends in countenance,” implying one should never achieve
perfection, because those around him would perceive the quality as
elitism. This same man, employing his ironical skill slandered the
authority of the British government, and led many innocent victims to
an early death between 1775 and 1783. Stephen Colbert, though a
staunch defender of all things American on his prior show, has
readily abandoned his true beliefs in an attempt to pander to the
brainwashed mainstream audience. The Last Thing You'd Eat Alone on
Bread has been in print since 1988, but extended its reach when it
began publishing online in 1996, and released its first collection in
1999. SNL, conceived in 1975, excelled through the past four
decades, until it became a totally one-sided, biased show – nothing
funny at all, and promptly aired its last episode. These and many
other actors have wrought catastrophic damage upon our political
system through their use of satire.
It isn't entirely their responsibility:
they couldn't have continued the enterprise if others hadn't begat
the concept itself, preparing the collapse of the United States through hidden faults in the foundation of Western thought. One
should begin by critiquing the famous dramatists of Ancient Greece.
When Sophocles directed Oedipus to declare, “I speak as one who is
a stranger to the story, a stranger to the crime” was the author
not urging the overthrow of order? Those treacherous Athenians,
cradle of civilization, poisoned the well of understanding at birth.
Their contemporary, Socrates (and his pupil, poet, and publicist
Plato), sabotaged knowledge by pretending to search for truth.
Posing in ignorance to invite the ignorance of others, what a
disastrous deed! The creation of a form of communication,
intentionally dedicated to obfuscation, confusion, and falsehood,
could only have been invented by minds too devious to defy reason,
the creation of a mind which seeks to make the lesser the greater.
But today, having failed to outlaw or
punish its practitioners, the leaders of the United States have determined
naive youth should be taught underhanded irony. Worse, those they
have chosen to for this endeavor are those least capable of fulfilling the basic
requirements of employment: high school English teachers. In spite
of the continual deflection of funds from education, into more proper
avenues such as expensive
unsuccessful technologies, or tax
cuts for big business,
teachers have failed to properly instruct students in the
complexities of satire. Their failure is of their own making, and so
widespread it must be intentional. Educators inability (or calculated negligence) to
foster critical thinking in their pupils, is the source of a susceptible public eager to accept conspiracies as truth.
This is only a tenth of the trouble
(not like that time in England where one guy proposed selling babies
as food – they really had a problem, which as another
proto-American said, “...They had
better do it, and decrease the surplus population.”), and
the other problem is of direction. Not the up or down kind, nor
right and left kind, or even east or west, but the who to trust kind.
It used to be, back when America was great (but will be again soon),
a citizen knew who could lead, but those days are gone. Citizens
distrust institutions, as they should. The State, the Press, the
Church(s), the Scientists, the People, the Spy Agencies, and the
Universities, though undisputed at the dawn of creation, diminished
themselves by each action they undertook. Right-seeing people saw
institutions as self-serving and as deceitful as the satirists.
These same, hardworking, right-seeing, every-man millionaires understood the solution. Buy the institutions personally (or influence if direct purchase was impossible), and impose new programs to rescue each institutions reputation. When they had succeed in their acquisitions (from the previous affluent owners:and those before them, and before them, and before them), they found the institutions intent on developing their own direction. For those new owners who kept their stubborn, disobedient institutions (bought and paid for fairly), they found themselves suffering constant assault. Other well meaning citizens, hesitant to purchase institutions, found it easier to assail any who stood in their way of a reasonable, confined, self-interested life even though it might damage the cohesion of society itself. The plummeting prestige of these institutions can not be the fault of the wealthy who have spent millions asserting their rights to a lifestyle which benefits themselves over the mass of citizens.
These same, hardworking, right-seeing, every-man millionaires understood the solution. Buy the institutions personally (or influence if direct purchase was impossible), and impose new programs to rescue each institutions reputation. When they had succeed in their acquisitions (from the previous affluent owners:and those before them, and before them, and before them), they found the institutions intent on developing their own direction. For those new owners who kept their stubborn, disobedient institutions (bought and paid for fairly), they found themselves suffering constant assault. Other well meaning citizens, hesitant to purchase institutions, found it easier to assail any who stood in their way of a reasonable, confined, self-interested life even though it might damage the cohesion of society itself. The plummeting prestige of these institutions can not be the fault of the wealthy who have spent millions asserting their rights to a lifestyle which benefits themselves over the mass of citizens.
Though one might consider the United
States to be threatened by foreign enemies, and to fall to oversea
swords, like golden Hellas, we are more like Roma. Like the Senators
of Rome who allowed the transformation of the Roman Republic into an
Empire, rather than risk their own lives, so the Senators again seem
willing to deliver the mantle of government to someone of
retrogressive sensibilities. Only ours is less qualified than Julius
Caesar.
And so we are left to contemplate the
greatest irony of all, a democracy unwilling to use any tools to
rescue itself. A democracy that has abdicated belief in all
authority, sending those who should speak to the gallows, to the
guillotine, to the Inquisition, to the flame. A democracy where the
people have chosen a man who howls false nothings into the face of
ignorance and thunders, unironically, “I am the only one who can
save you!”
Comments
Post a Comment